Screener
GRW vs VOTE
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs TCW Transform 500 ETF
Key differences
- VOTE costs 0.70% less per year.
- VOTE is significantly larger than GRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GRW follows a active selection strategy; VOTE uses index tracking.
- GRW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRW | VOTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -7.9% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.49% | 12.21% |
| Max drawdown | -23.84% | -25.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GRW and VOTE
Explore further