Screener
GSEU vs KAT
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- GSEU costs 0.50% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than GSEU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSEU follows a index tracking strategy; KAT uses active selection.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSEU | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $114M | $688M |
| Since | 2016 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.61% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.17% | — |
| Max drawdown | -35.71% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSEU and KAT
Explore further