Screener
GSGO vs FELG
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FELG costs 0.27% less per year.
- FELG is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | FELG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $5.3B |
| Since | 1999 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.56% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -23.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSGO and FELG
Explore further