Screener
GSGO vs FTGS
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs First Trust Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.15% less per year.
- FTGS is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; FTGS uses index tracking.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $1.2B |
| Since | 1999 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.09% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +14.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.51% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -19.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSGO and FTGS
Explore further