Screener
GSGO vs IWY
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWY costs 0.25% less per year.
- IWY is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; IWY uses index tracking.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $16.5B |
| Since | 1999 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.63% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -32.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSGO and IWY
Explore further