Screener
GSGO vs OALC
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; OALC uses index tracking.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | OALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $220M |
| Since | 1999 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +34.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.05% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -26.82% |
Similar to GSGO and OALC
Explore further