Screener
GSGO vs OAIM
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs OneAscent International Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.50% less per year.
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; OAIM uses index tracking.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | OAIM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $344M |
| Since | 1999 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.74% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -14.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSGO and OAIM
Explore further