Screener
GSGO vs PGRO
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; PGRO uses index tracking.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | PGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $107M |
| Since | 1999 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.02% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -34.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSGO and PGRO
Explore further