Screener
GSIE vs GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSIE costs 0.10% less per year.
- GSIE is significantly larger than GEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSIE covers global markets; GEM covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSIE | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.6B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.55% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.9% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.21% | 19.07% |
| Max drawdown | -34.63% | -37.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSIE and GEM
Explore further