Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GSJY vs GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

GSJY

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$84M

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

Key differences

Both GSJY and GEM are equity ETFs. GSJY charges 0.25% a year and GEM 0.35%. The main difference: GSJY follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.

  • GSJY follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
  • GSJY covers the Asia-Pacific region; GEM covers emerging markets.
  • GSJY costs 0.10% less per year.
  • GEM is much larger than GSJY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

GSJYGEM
Annual cost (TER)0.25%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$84M$1.7B
Since20162015
Dividend yield1.75%1.85%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacificemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+25.9%+41.2%
CAGR 3Y+18.4%+21.9%
CAGR 5Y+8.4%+6.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.801.00
Volatility 1Y19.75%20.62%
Max drawdown-32.53%-37.02%

Similar to GSJY and GEM