Screener
GSJY vs JPAN
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF vs Matthews Japan Active ETF
Key differences
Both GSJY and JPAN are equity ETFs. GSJY charges 0.25% a year and JPAN 0.79%. The main difference: GSJY follows a index tracking strategy; JPAN uses active selection.
- GSJY follows a index tracking strategy; JPAN uses active selection.
- GSJY costs 0.54% less per year.
- GSJY is much larger than JPAN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSJY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSJY | JPAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $84M | $8M |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 4.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.9% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.75% | 19.92% |
| Max drawdown | -32.53% | -15.25% |
Similar to GSJY and JPAN
Explore further