Screener
JPAN vs EWJ
Matthews Japan Active ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
Both JPAN and EWJ are equity ETFs. JPAN charges 0.79% a year and EWJ 0.49%. The main difference: JPAN follows a active selection strategy; EWJ uses index tracking.
- JPAN follows a active selection strategy; EWJ uses index tracking.
- EWJ costs 0.30% less per year.
- EWJ is much larger than JPAN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JPAN | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $21.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 4.34% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.2% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.92% | 19.84% |
| Max drawdown | -15.25% | -33.14% |
Similar to JPAN and EWJ
Explore further