Screener
GSLC vs BASG
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF vs Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
Key differences
- GSLC costs 0.52% less per year.
- GSLC is significantly larger than BASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSLC covers north america markets; BASG covers global.
- GSLC follows a index enhanced strategy; BASG uses active selection.
- GSLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSLC | BASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.0B | $467M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index enhanced | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.85% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.69% | -19.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSLC and BASG
Explore further