Screener
GSLC vs BGRO
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF vs iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF
Key differences
- GSLC costs 0.46% less per year.
- GSLC is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSLC is classified as equity, while BGRO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GSLC follows a index enhanced strategy; BGRO uses active selection.
- GSLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSLC | BGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.0B | $9M |
| Since | 2015 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.86% | 18.04% |
| Max drawdown | -33.69% | -24.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSLC and BGRO
Explore further