Screener
GSSC vs FDG
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- GSSC costs 0.25% less per year.
- GSSC follows a index tracking strategy; FDG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSSC | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $952M | $387M |
| Since | 2017 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.9% | +35.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +13.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.61% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -41.38% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSSC and FDG
Explore further