Screener
GTO vs BKLN
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Invesco Senior Loan ETF
Key differences
- GTO costs 0.30% less per year.
- BKLN is significantly larger than GTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO follows a active selection strategy; BKLN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BKLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BKLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | BKLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $6.8B |
| Since | 2016 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 6.91% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | 2.75% |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -24.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and BKLN
Explore further