Screener
GTO vs FIGB
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTO is significantly larger than FIGB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO follows a active selection strategy; FIGB uses index tracking.
- GTO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | FIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $465M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 4.13% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +3.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | 4.53% |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -18.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and FIGB
Explore further