Screener
GTO vs VRP
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- GTO costs 0.15% less per year.
- GTO follows a active selection strategy; VRP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VRP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $2.6B |
| Since | 2016 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 6.39% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 1.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | 2.87% |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -46.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and VRP
Explore further