Screener
GTO vs VRIG
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, VRIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2016 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 2.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and VRIG
Explore further