Skip to content
Screener

GTOH vs PHYL

Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF vs PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF

GTOH

Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

PHYL

PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

Both GTOH and PHYL are fixed income ETFs. The main difference: GTOH follows a index tracking strategy; PHYL uses active selection.

  • GTOH follows a index tracking strategy; PHYL uses active selection.
  • Over the last three years, PHYL has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

GTOHPHYL
Annual cost (TER)0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$1.3B
Since2018
Dividend yield7.66%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+6.8%+7.2%
CAGR 3Y+7.9%+9.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+4.1%
Sharpe 3Y1.041.18
Volatility 1Y3.02%3.35%
Max drawdown-4.17%-22.07%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to GTOH and PHYL