Screener
GTOH vs VRIG
Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
Both GTOH and VRIG are fixed income ETFs. The main difference: GTOH follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- GTOH follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last three years, GTOH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTOH | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $1.5B |
| Since | — | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.80% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.8% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.8% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 2.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.00% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -4.17% | -13.04% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.