Screener
VRIG vs GTOQ
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF vs Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.09% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than GTOQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRIG is classified as fixed income, while GTOQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- VRIG follows a active selection strategy; GTOQ uses multi strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, GTOQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRIG | GTOQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $162M |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.86% | 6.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +8.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.92 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.50% | 3.69% |
| Max drawdown | -13.04% | -15.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRIG and GTOQ
Explore further