Screener
GTOQ vs BKLN
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF vs Invesco Senior Loan ETF
Key differences
- GTOQ costs 0.26% less per year.
- BKLN is significantly larger than GTOQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTOQ is classified as alternative, while BKLN is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GTOQ follows a multi strategy strategy; BKLN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GTOQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BKLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTOQ | BKLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $6.8B |
| Since | 2020 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 6.92% | 6.91% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.6% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.69% | 2.75% |
| Max drawdown | -15.96% | -24.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTOQ and BKLN
Explore further