Screener
GTR vs NTSI
WisdomTree Target Range Fund vs WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
Key differences
GTR is an alternative ETF, while NTSI is a mixed asset ETF. GTR charges 0.70% a year and NTSI 0.26%.
- GTR is an alternative fund, while NTSI is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GTR follows a option income strategy; NTSI uses active selection.
- GTR covers North America; NTSI covers global markets excluding the US.
- NTSI costs 0.44% less per year.
- NTSI is much larger than GTR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, NTSI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTR | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $69M | $500M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.30% | 3.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.2% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | +14.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.70% | 15.53% |
| Max drawdown | -21.44% | -34.01% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.