Skip to content
Screener

GTR vs NTSX

WisdomTree Target Range Fund vs WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

GTR

WisdomTree Target Range Fund

Annual cost

0.70%

Fund size

$69M

NTSX

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$1.4B

Key differences

GTR is an alternative ETF, while NTSX is an equity ETF. GTR charges 0.70% a year and NTSX 0.20%.

  • GTR is an alternative fund, while NTSX is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • GTR follows a option income strategy; NTSX uses active selection.
  • NTSX costs 0.50% less per year.
  • NTSX is much larger than GTR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, NTSX has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

GTRNTSX
Annual cost (TER)0.70%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$69M$1.4B
Since20212018
Dividend yield5.30%1.07%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+18.2%+22.4%
CAGR 3Y+12.3%+19.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+9.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.821.00
Volatility 1Y9.70%12.92%
Max drawdown-21.44%-31.34%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GTR and NTSX