Screener
GUSE vs OAEM
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF vs OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- GUSE costs 0.95% less per year.
- GUSE is significantly larger than OAEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GUSE covers north america markets; OAEM covers emerging markets.
- GUSE follows a active selection strategy; OAEM uses index tracking.
- GUSE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GUSE | OAEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 1.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $341M | $100M |
| Since | 2008 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +57.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 22.18% |
| Max drawdown | -8.54% | -17.05% |
Similar to GUSE and OAEM
Explore further