Screener
OAEM vs GSGO
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF vs Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.80% less per year.
- OAEM covers emerging markets markets; GSGO covers north america.
- OAEM follows a index tracking strategy; GSGO uses active selection.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OAEM | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.25% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $100M | $163M |
| Since | 2022 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 0.63% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.18% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.05% | -13.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OAEM and GSGO
Explore further