Screener
GVI vs CAFX
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF vs Congress Intermediate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GVI costs 0.15% less per year.
- GVI is significantly larger than CAFX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GVI follows a index tracking strategy; CAFX uses active selection.
- GVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GVI | CAFX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $325M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.56% | 3.99% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.52% | 2.91% |
| Max drawdown | -12.93% | -2.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GVI and CAFX
Explore further