Screener
GVI vs INTM
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF vs Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF
Key differences
- GVI costs 0.15% less per year.
- GVI is significantly larger than INTM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GVI follows a index tracking strategy; INTM uses active selection.
- GVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GVI | INTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $101M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.56% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.51% | — |
| Max drawdown | -12.93% | -2.65% |
Similar to GVI and INTM
Explore further