Screener
GVI vs INMU
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF vs iShares Intermediate Muni Income Active ETF
Key differences
- GVI costs 0.10% less per year.
- GVI is significantly larger than INMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GVI | INMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $457M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.56% | 3.37% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.0% | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.52% | 2.50% |
| Max drawdown | -12.93% | -10.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GVI and INMU
Explore further