Screener
GVI vs MEAR
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- GVI costs 0.06% less per year.
- GVI follows a index tracking strategy; MEAR uses active selection.
- GVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GVI | MEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.56% | 2.87% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +3.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.0% | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | -0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.52% | 0.86% |
| Max drawdown | -12.93% | -2.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GVI and MEAR
Explore further