Screener
GXC vs MCHI
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
- MCHI is significantly larger than GXC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXC | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $479M | $6.7B |
| Since | 2007 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.45% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.7% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.8% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -3.9% | -5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.36 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.74% | 20.00% |
| Max drawdown | -60.23% | -62.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXC and MCHI
Explore further