Screener
MCHI vs ECNS
iShares MSCI China ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- MCHI is significantly larger than ECNS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, MCHI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCHI | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.7B | $82M |
| Since | 2011 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | 6.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.0% | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.00% | 20.87% |
| Max drawdown | -62.84% | -63.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCHI and ECNS
Explore further