Screener
GXIG vs IPAV
Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF
Key differences
- GXIG costs 0.40% less per year.
- GXIG is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GXIG is classified as fixed income, while IPAV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GXIG covers north america markets; IPAV covers global.
- GXIG follows a active selection strategy; IPAV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXIG | IPAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $175M | $5M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.14% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.09% |
| Max drawdown | -3.19% | -14.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXIG and IPAV
Explore further