Screener
GXIG vs QRMI
Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
- GXIG costs 0.45% less per year.
- GXIG is significantly larger than QRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GXIG is classified as fixed income, while QRMI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GXIG follows a active selection strategy; QRMI uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXIG | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $175M | $16M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 12.36% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 5.77% |
| Max drawdown | -3.19% | -20.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXIG and QRMI
Explore further