Screener
GXIG vs SAMT
Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- GXIG costs 0.51% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than GXIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GXIG is classified as fixed income, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GXIG follows a active selection strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXIG | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $175M | $619M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.62% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +46.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -3.19% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXIG and SAMT
Explore further