Screener
GXPC vs FCOM
Global X Purecap MSCI Communication Services ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
Key differences
- FCOM costs 0.07% less per year.
- FCOM is significantly larger than GXPC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FCOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXPC | FCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.32% |
| Max drawdown | -16.59% | -46.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXPC and FCOM
Explore further