Screener
GXPC vs IYZ
Global X Purecap MSCI Communication Services ETF vs iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
Key differences
- GXPC costs 0.23% less per year.
- IYZ is significantly larger than GXPC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXPC | IYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $966M |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.59% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +63.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +30.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.46% |
| Max drawdown | -16.59% | -39.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXPC and IYZ
Explore further