Screener
GXPE vs EFA
Global X Purecap MSCI Energy ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- GXPE costs 0.17% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than GXPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GXPE covers north america markets; EFA covers global ex us.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXPE | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $75.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.16% |
| Max drawdown | -12.37% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXPE and EFA
Explore further