Screener
GXPE vs URTH
Global X Purecap MSCI Energy ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
- GXPE costs 0.09% less per year.
- URTH is significantly larger than GXPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GXPE covers north america markets; URTH covers global.
- URTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXPE | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $9.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.17% |
| Max drawdown | -12.37% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXPE and URTH
Explore further