Screener
GXUS vs GEM
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- GXUS costs 0.17% less per year.
- GXUS covers global markets; GEM covers emerging markets.
- GXUS follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXUS | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $607M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.30% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.25% | 19.07% |
| Max drawdown | -13.90% | -37.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXUS and GEM
Explore further