Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

HAP vs BUZZ

VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Social Sentiment ETF

HAP

VanEck Natural Resources ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.41%

Fund size

$316M

BUZZ

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.76%

Fund size

$100M

Key differences

  • HAP costs 0.35% less per year.
  • HAP is significantly larger than BUZZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • HAP covers global markets; BUZZ covers north america.
  • Over the last 3 years, BUZZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

HAPBUZZ
Annual cost (TER)0.41%0.76%
Fund size (AUM)$316M$100M
Since20082021
Dividend yield1.86%0.00%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+47.8%+42.3%
CAGR 3Y+18.4%+37.5%
CAGR 5Y+11.3%+10.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.921.09
Volatility 1Y14.91%31.21%
Max drawdown-44.14%-56.87%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to HAP and BUZZ