Screener
HAP vs EINC
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Energy Income ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.05% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EINC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | EINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $147M |
| Since | 2008 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.8% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.3% | +23.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.91% | 14.17% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -68.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and EINC
Explore further