Screener
HAP vs FDRS
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.08% less per year.
- HAP is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- HAP covers global markets; FDRS covers north america.
- HAP follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $77M |
| Since | 2008 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | — |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and FDRS
Explore further