Screener
HAP vs FMKT
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs The Free Markets ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.35% less per year.
- HAP is significantly larger than FMKT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP covers global markets; FMKT covers north america.
- HAP follows a index tracking strategy; FMKT uses active selection.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | FMKT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $15M |
| Since | 2008 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | — |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -17.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and FMKT
Explore further