Screener
HAP vs ICLN
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, HAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +87.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 25.93% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and ICLN
Explore further