Screener
HAP vs VXF
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VXF costs 0.36% less per year.
- VXF is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP covers global markets; VXF covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, VXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VXF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | VXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $89.9B |
| Since | 2008 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 1.07% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +20.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 17.31% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -41.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and VXF
Explore further