Screener
HAP vs VTHR
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTHR costs 0.35% less per year.
- VTHR is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP covers global markets; VTHR covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, VTHR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | VTHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2008 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 12.42% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -34.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and VTHR
Explore further