Screener
HAPS vs HQGO
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF vs Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- HQGO costs 0.27% less per year.
- HAPS is significantly larger than HQGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAPS | HQGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $157M | $48M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.11% | 13.47% |
| Max drawdown | -27.44% | -20.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAPS and HQGO
Explore further