Screener
HAPS vs HFGO
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF vs Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- HAPS follows a index tracking strategy; HFGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, HFGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAPS | HFGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $157M | $181M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.0% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.11% | 17.94% |
| Max drawdown | -27.44% | -44.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAPS and HFGO
Explore further